Global warming has been rebranded as “climate change” after it was determined the data for the warmth our planet has been experienced was wrong. Now, fresh reports from Nov. 2010 are telling the truth behind “climate change” and it’s not about the environment.
The worst part about the debate is how many international organizations have fallen for it, and how many changes are being made because of it, even after the data has been debunked.
Some have made the connection between climate change and wealth redistribution, something President Obama is all for. The clips below are from articles available online with information out of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Click on the headlines below to read the full article.
Global Carbon Tax Urged at UN Climate Conference
“A climate change response must have at its heart a redistribution of wealth and resources.” And “Controlling carbon is a bureaucrat’s dream. If you control carbon, you control life.” And from Colorado Senator Tim Wirth (1990), “even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing, in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”
IPCC Expert admits UN goal is Wealth Redistribution
“…the failed treaty actually contained as many paragraphs outlining the payment of ‘climate debt’ reparations by Western nations as it did emission reduction schemes.” Ottmar Edenhofer, a German economist and IPCC Co-chair told a German newspaper, “climate policy is redistributing the world’s wealth…it’s a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization.”
UN Official Admits Cap and Trade Is Wealth Redistribution
“Assertions made by climate-change skeptics that there are ulterior motives behind climate-change legislation were confirmed by a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.” Our Changing Globe wrote of cap and trade (2009): “the intention is that the industrial word would pay the underdeveloped world huge sums of money for doing nothing at all, and you can easily imagine the bureaucracy and corruption that would occur if this nonsense were ever to come into being.”
I remember in the ‘70s we were worried about the coming ice age. Then in the 2000, the planet was heating up. Do we really believe the temperature of our planet has increased .75% of 1 degree during the 20th century? How accurate was the data to start with, and how much of that “increase” is fluctuation? Think about our snow pack in Colorado. I’ve lived here for nearly 20 years and we’ve had great years, and not so great years. Let’s work on making sure our politicians don’t jump on the bandwagon and make decisions that will affect us longer than “global warming.”